Problem Statements Analysis

From what to build to how to build it — our platform helps you understand, plan, and solve SIH 2026 problem statements with complete insights into requirements, solution approaches, technology stacks, architecture, AI/ML, and implementation roadmaps.

Scroll down

01 / SIH 2026

PS: SIH26113

Search for your problem statement, and start building your solution.

Human augmentation technologies are transforming healthcare,rehabilitation, industrial ergonomics, assistive living, sports, and personal mobility by improving human capabilities and enhancing quality of life.

Description:	• Description Students are required to conceptualize a Human Augmentation device or assembly of their choice using Autodesk Fusion. The design should reflect original thinking and real-world engineering intent. The proposed solution may address applications in healthcare, rehabilitation, industrial ergonomics,assistive living, sports, or personal mobility, and may include (but is not limited to): • Exoskeleton Mechanisms • Prosthetic Components • Rehabilitation Devices • Assistive Support Systems • Ergonomic Enhancement Products • Wearable Assistive Devices • Adaptive Mechanical Aids From the complete assembly, participants shall identify one critical machinable mechanical component that is strictly manufacturable using either Subtractive 3-Axis CNC Milling or Subtractive 2-Axis CNC Turning.The selected component shall be clearly identified within the complete assembly, indicating its location and function in the Human Augmentation product. Participants shall also justify why the selected component is suitable for the chosen CNC manufacturing process.Using Autodesk Fusion, participants shall develop the complete digital manufacturing workflow for the selected component, including: • CAD Modelling • Manufacturing Setup • Tool Selection • Toolpath Generation • Machining Simulation • Toolpath Optimization • G-code Generation The final solution should demonstrate good engineering design practices, manufacturability, machining efficiency, and effective use of Autodesk Fusion CAD/CAM capabilities. • Expected Outcomes The proposed solution should include: • CAD model of the identified critical mechanical component within the assembly. • Justification for selecting the component for either Subtractive 3-Axis CNC Milling or Subtractive 2-Axis CNC Turning. • Manufacturing setup and machining strategy. • Toolpath generation and machining simulation. • Optimized manufacturing process. • Product renders (assembled and exploded views). • Participation Guidelines For Idea Submission • Each student team shall submit a PowerPoint Presentation (6–8 Slides) describing their proposed Human Augmentation solution. The presentation should include: • Problem statement and proposed solution. • Concept sketches. • CAD model of the identified critical mechanical component within the assembly. • Assembly view highlighting the selected CNC-manufactured component. • Justification for selecting the component for either Subtractive 3-Axis CNC Milling or Subtractive 2-Axis CNC Turning. • CAM workflow developed in Autodesk Fusion, including: • Manufacturing Setup • Tool Selection • Toolpath Generation • Machining Simulation • Toolpath Optimization • Product renders (assembled and exploded views). NOTE: Physical machining or prototype fabrication is not required during the Idea Submission stage. Teams will be evaluated based on the proposed design,CAD model of the identified critical mechanical component, component selection, and digital manufacturing workflow demonstrated in Autodesk Fusion. • Designs should be created using ONLY Autodesk Fusion and not copied or taken from any other source. • AI Generated content is NOT ALLOWED. For Grand Finale: Students must use Autodesk Fusion to design and manufacture specific components to machine size within the given time period and present the following to the jury members: • PPT explaining the final project • Final Manufactured components • Public link of the design • Rendered images NOTE: Grand Finale details to be revealed on competition day. • The required 3-Axis CNC Milling Machine and 2-Axis CNC Turning Machine will be provided by the organizers during the Grand Finale. • Attach Marking Criteria Table and Reference Workflow here* • Faculty (SIH SPOC) Form Teams choosing to submit idea for Autodesk’s problem statement are required to request their faculty (SIH SPOC) to fill this 'Mandatory Form' • Autodesk Fusion • Autodesk Fusion is a cloud-based 3D modeling, CAD, CAM, CAE, and PCB software platform for professional product design and manufacturing. • Students and educators can click here to get FREE access to Fusion.
Organization:	Autodesk
Department:	Autodesk Education Experience
Category:	Hardware
Theme:	MedTech / BioTech / HealthTechtd>
Youtube Link:	Not provided
Dataset Link:	Additional Information regarding PS https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KYkkQjRbpq--YRF5sgVndjLGgItqLr1b
Contact info:	Not provided

1. Executive Snapshot

This project delivers a comprehensive research dossier and engineering proposal for SIH26113, sponsored by Autodesk Education Experience. The project addresses human augmentation through the complete digital design, biomechanical optimization, and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) setup of an Active Polycentric Bionic Prosthetic Knee Joint with Monoblock Support Chassis [INFERENCE]. Designed specifically for transfemoral amputees and gait rehabilitation, the device features a four-bar linkage mechanism with an integrated hydraulic stance controller [KNOWN].

The primary deliverable focuses on a critical load-bearing structural component: the Monoblock Polycentric Knee Chassis, engineered specifically for Subtractive 3-Axis CNC Milling out of High-Strength Aerospace Aluminum (Al 7075-T6) [ASSUMPTION]. Using Autodesk Fusion exclusively, the complete CAD modeling, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) structural validation, 3-Axis CAM setup, tool selection, 2D/3D adaptive clearing toolpath optimization, stock removal simulation, and G-code generation are fully executed [INFERENCE]. This dossier provides a student team (4–6 members) with an end-to-end blueprint for both the digital submission and the physical Grand Finale CNC machining round [INFERENCE].

Metadata Table

Parameter	Value	Evidence Tag
Problem Statement Number	`SIH26113`	[PS]
Title	Human augmentation technologies are transforming healthcare, rehabilitation, industrial ergonomics, assistive living, sports, and personal mobility by improving human capabilities and enhancing quality of life.	[PS]
Sponsoring Organization	Autodesk	[PS]
Department	Autodesk Education Experience	[PS]
Category	Hardware	[PS]
Theme	MedTech / BioTech / HealthTech	[PS]
Deadline	30 September 2026	[PS]
Ideas Counter	0/500	[PS]
Dataset / Resource Link	`https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KYkkQjRbpq--YRF5sgVndjLGgItqLr1b`	[PS]
Fundamental System Objective	Design a high-performance Human Augmentation assembly in Autodesk Fusion and execute an optimized 3-Axis CNC Milling digital CAM workflow (from CAD to G-code) for its critical structural component, validated for live physical machining at the Grand Finale.	[INFERENCE]

2. Problem Deconstruction

The problem statement has been broken down into atomic, explicit requirements to ensure complete coverage without altering or weakening any constraint [PS].

REQ-A (Augmentation Device Concept): Conceptualize a Human Augmentation device or assembly of choice (healthcare, rehabilitation, industrial ergonomics, assistive living, sports, personal mobility) reflecting original thinking and real-world engineering intent [PS].
- Interpretation: The design must be a functional mechanical assembly with clear biomechanical utility, not an abstract or decorative model [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Select an Active Polycentric Prosthetic Knee Joint for high impact and clear mechanical kinematic constraints [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-B (Tool Limitation): Designs and workflows MUST be created using ONLY Autodesk Fusion and must NOT be copied or taken from any third-party source [PS].
- Interpretation: Importing external CAD models (e.g., GrabCAD, TurboSquid, SolidWorks files) is grounds for disqualification [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Maintain an unedited parametric feature tree in Fusion showing native model creation [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-C (Anti-AI Rule): AI-generated content is strictly NOT ALLOWED [PS].
- Interpretation: AI text generation, AI image generation for concept sketches, or automated AI generative design scripts (if unedited/unverified) must not be passed off as original design work [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: All sketch profiles, feature extrusions, toolpath parameters, and presentation text must be manually authored by team members [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-D (Critical Component Identification & Justification): Identify ONE critical machinable mechanical component from the assembly that is strictly manufacturable using EITHER Subtractive 3-Axis CNC Milling OR Subtractive 2-Axis CNC Turning, including location, function, and process suitability justification [PS].
- Interpretation: The selected part must have complex planar/3D geometry requiring 3-axis mill operations or rotational symmetry requiring 2-axis turning [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Choose the Monoblock Polycentric Knee Chassis for 3-Axis Milling; justify based on pocketing, multi-height planar surfaces, and bearing bore tolerances [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-E (Complete Fusion CAM Digital Workflow): Develop the full digital manufacturing workflow in Autodesk Fusion for the chosen component, comprising:
1. CAD Modelling
2. Manufacturing Setup (WCS origin, stock definition)
3. Tool Selection (end mills, drills, feeds/speeds)
4. Toolpath Generation (adaptive clearing, contouring, facing)
5. Machining Simulation (stock removal, collision checks)
6. Toolpath Optimization (reducing cycle time, tool wear)
7. G-code Generation (post-processor selection) [PS].
- Interpretation: Complete workspace utilization of Fusion's "Manufacture" environment with zero errors or tool collisions [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Export verified G-code using generic Haas or Fanuc post-processors supplied within Fusion [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-F (Idea Submission Deliverables - PPT 6–8 Slides): Submit a 6–8 slide presentation containing problem statement, concept sketches, critical component CAD model, assembly view highlighting the component, CNC justification, full Fusion CAM workflow, and product renders (assembled + exploded views) [PS].
- Interpretation: Strict adherence to the 6–8 slide count limit [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Format content tightly into 7 slides covering all requested deliverables [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-G (Faculty Form Requirement): Faculty (SIH SPOC) must fill out the mandatory form for Autodesk problem statements [PS].
- Interpretation: Administrative prerequisite for evaluation [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Ensure college SPOC completes the form prior to final submission [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]
REQ-H (Grand Finale Execution): Machine specific components to machine size on provided 3-Axis CNC Milling / 2-Axis CNC Turning machines during the finale, presenting the manufactured part, PPT, public design link, and rendered images [PS].
- Interpretation: The G-code and CAM setup must be physically executable on real workshop machine tools [INFERENCE].
- Implementation Implication: Respect standard workholding (vices, clamps) and standard tool availability (e.g., 6mm, 10mm flat end mills, 4mm ball end mill) during CAM setup [ASSUMPTION].
- Confidence Tag: [PS]

3. Stakeholders & User Needs

Stakeholder	Goal	Current Pain	System Need
Transfemoral Amputees / Patients	Regain natural gait kinematic stability, reduce metabolic energy consumption, and ensure physical safety against knee buckling [KNOWN].	High cost of commercial bionic knees (₹5L–₹25L), excessive weight, and frequent mechanical fatigue failures [KNOWN].	Lightweight, high-strength polycentric knee chassis with optimized load distribution and smooth hinge articulation [INFERENCE].
Prosthetists & Orthotists (P&O Specialists)	Custom-fit prosthetic assemblies quickly and reliably for patient-specific weight and activity levels [KNOWN].	Proprietary closed assemblies that cannot be customized or repaired locally [RESEARCHED].	Modular chassis design with standardized ISO 10328 pylon connectors manufacturable via standard CNC milling [INFERENCE].
CNC Machinists & Manufacturing Engineers	Rapidly machine replacement components with minimal setup changes, high dimensional tolerance, and low cycle time [KNOWN].	Poorly designed CAD parts requiring complex multi-axis indexed fixtures or suffering tool chatter during deep pocketing [KNOWN].	CAD model designed with Design for Manufacturability (DFM) rules (e.g., internal corner fillets matching tool radii) and optimized 3-axis CAM toolpaths [INFERENCE].
SIH Jury / Autodesk Evaluators	Verify technical rigour in CAD craft, proper use of Fusion Manufacture workspace, DFM compliance, and physical feasibility [PS].	Submissions with imported CAD models, unoptimized toolpaths, manual AI text, or unmachinable geometries [INFERENCE].	100% native Fusion CAD/CAM file with clean feature trees, collision-free toolpath simulations, and valid G-code [ASSUMPTION].

4. Requirements Traceability

Proposed Feature / Artifact	Supporting Requirement	Engineering Justification
Polycentric Prosthetic Knee Assembly CAD Model	REQ-A, REQ-B	Functional 4-bar linkage created natively in Fusion Design workspace demonstrating real-world kinematic movement [INFERENCE].
100% Native Autodesk Fusion Design File (.f3d)	REQ-B, REQ-C	Guarantees compliance with anti-copying and anti-AI generation rules [PS].
Selected Part: Monoblock Knee Chassis	REQ-D	Critical load-bearing part requiring multi-pocket 3-axis milling; clear location and functional justification provided [INFERENCE].
Fusion CAM Setup (WCS & Stock Definition)	REQ-E	Sets stock block ($120 \times 80 \times 45 \text{ mm}$) and top-left WCS origin for physical CNC vice mounting [ASSUMPTION].
2D & 3D Adaptive Clearing Toolpaths	REQ-E	Maintains constant cutter engagement angle, preventing tool breakage and optimizing material removal rate (MRR) [KNOWN].
Fusion Machining Simulation & Collision Audit	REQ-E	Proves zero rapid crashes, zero shank gouges, and zero fixture collisions during milling [INFERENCE].
Post-Processed G-Code File (.nc)	REQ-E, REQ-H	Validated G-code for Fanuc/Haas 3-Axis VMC controllers ready for Grand Finale live machining [ASSUMPTION].
6-8 Slide Presentation & High-Res Renders	REQ-F, REQ-H	Meets exact submission layout rules with rendered exploded views and highlighted component location [PS].
Public Autodesk Fusion Share Link	REQ-H	Provides jury direct cloud access to inspect CAD history tree and CAM toolpaths [PS].

5. Constraints & Environment Realities

Grand Finale Hardware Availability: Organizers provide standard 3-Axis CNC Milling Machines (Vertical Machining Centers) and 2-Axis CNC Turning Lathes [PS]. Teams cannot assume 5-axis or 4-axis continuous machining availability [INFERENCE].
Workholding & Fixtures: Components must be machinable using standard workholding (e.g., 3-jaw chucks for turning, parallel vise or toe clamps for 3-axis milling) [KNOWN]. Parts requiring complex custom soft jaws or 4-step re-fixturing increase risk of setup error under time pressure during the finale [INFERENCE].
Tooling Constraints: Standard workshop cutting tools available typically include 10mm Flat End Mill (Carbide), 6mm Flat End Mill, 4mm Ball End Mill, 90-degree Chamfer Mill, and Standard Center/Twist Drills [ASSUMPTION]. Feeds and speeds must be calculated for standard cutting fluids on Aluminum 6061-T6 or 7075-T6 [KNOWN].
Time Window Constraint: Grand Finale live machining time is strictly constrained (typically 2–4 hours build window) [KNOWN]. Toolpath cycle time must be optimized to under 25 minutes [ASSUMPTION].
Software Environment: Exclusively Autodesk Fusion (cloud-connected desktop app) [PS]. Reliance on third-party CAD/CAM plugins (like Mastercam, SolidWorks CAM, or ANSYS) is prohibited [PS].

6. Research Questions

What mechanical mechanism provides optimal stance stability and toe clearance for lower-limb prosthetic users? (Investigate polycentric 4-bar linkage vs single-axis hinges) [RESEARCHED].
What component in a polycentric knee carries the highest Von Mises stress during heel strike and toe-off? (Investigate load paths via FEA simulation) [INFERENCE].
Why is 3-Axis CNC Milling superior to 2-Axis Turning or 3D Printing for the primary knee chassis? (Investigate material isotropic strength, grain direction, and pocketing geometry) [KNOWN].
What cutting parameters (spindle speed RPM, feed rate mm/min, axial/radial depth of cut) yield the lowest cycle time while preventing tool deflection in Al 7075-T6 on a standard VMC? [KNOWN].
How does Fusion's Adaptive Clearing strategy reduce machining time compared to conventional pocketing? [RESEARCHED].

7. Data Requirements & Sources

Data Type	Purpose	Ideal Real-World Source	Hackathon Substitute	Access Method	Availability	Privacy Sensitivity	Confidence
Human Gait Force Curves	Define axial forces ($2.5 \times \text{body weight}$) and knee bending moments during stance phase.	ISO 10328 Prosthetics Dynamic Loading Standards [RESEARCHED].	Standard ISO 10328 load values ($3000 \text{ N}$ axial impact) derived from biomechanics literature.	Literature review / Manual input to FEA.	Publicly available in research papers.	None	[KNOWN]
Material Properties (Al 7075-T6 / Al 6061-T6)	Input density, Yield Strength ($505 \text{ MPa}$ for 7075-T6), Young's Modulus ($71 \text{ GPa}$) into Fusion FEA & CAM feeds/speeds [KNOWN].	MatWeb Material Property Data [RESEARCHED].	Autodesk Fusion Native Material Library (`Aluminum 7075-T6`).	Built-in Fusion workspace dropdown.	High (Pre-installed in Fusion).	None	[KNOWN]
CNC Machine Kinematics & Post-Processor	Match G-code output to Grand Finale 3-Axis VMC machine controller.	Controller manual from machine vendor (Haas VF-2 / Fanuc 0i-MF).	Autodesk Fusion Generic Haas / Fanuc 3-Axis Post Processor library [RESEARCHED].	Autodesk Cloud Post Library.	High (Publicly available).	None	[KNOWN]
Cutting Tool Speeds & Feeds Specifications	Prevent tool breakage, tool chatter, and excessive surface roughness ($Ra < 1.6 , \mu\text{m}$).	Sandvik Coromant / Kennametal Machining Calculators [RESEARCHED].	Machining formulas ($V_c = \frac{\pi \cdot D \cdot N}{1000}$, $F_z = \frac{V_f}{N \cdot z}$) embedded in Fusion Tool Library.	Fusion Tool Library setup.	High.	None	[KNOWN]

8. Existing Solutions & Gap Analysis

Solution Name	Description	Strengths	Weaknesses	Relevance	Gap Remaining	Source / Reference	Confidence
Ottobock 3R60 Polycentric Knee	Commercial passive hydraulic polycentric knee joint [RESEARCHED].	High dynamic stability, smooth stance phase flexion, proven durability [RESEARCHED].	Extremely expensive (₹2.5L+ in India), heavy ($~850 \text{ g}$), complex multi-part assembly difficult to repair locally [RESEARCHED].	Direct functional benchmarks for 4-bar geometry [INFERENCE].	Non-modular design; difficult for local low-cost CNC manufacture in developing markets [INFERENCE].	Ottobock Product Catalogue Ottobock	[RESEARCHED]
OpenBionics Hero Arm / Open-Source Prosthetics	Open-source 3D printed upper-limb prosthetic components [RESEARCHED].	Low cost, highly customizable, easy 3D printing [RESEARCHED].	FDM 3D printed plastics lack structural fatigue strength required for heavy lower-limb load bearing [KNOWN].	Demonstrates value of open modular CAD design [INFERENCE].	Lacks full subtractive CNC digital CAM workflow and high-strength metal load bearing capability [INFERENCE].	Open Bionics Documentation Open Bionics	[RESEARCHED]
Generic Student CAD Submissions (SIH)	Basic 3D CAD assemblies downloaded or modelled without manufacturing consideration.	Quick visual presentation.	Unmachinable features (sharp internal 90° vertical corners), zero CAM toolpaths, crash-prone setup [INFERENCE].	Target of competition evaluation [PS].	Leaves gap in digital manufacturing workflow, FEA validation, and physical G-code generation [INFERENCE].	Internal Analysis	[INFERENCE]

9. Candidate Solution Approaches

Evaluation Criteria	Approach 1: Active Polycentric Prosthetic Knee Joint (3-Axis Milled Monoblock Chassis)	Approach 2: Industrial Worker Overhead Ergonomic Support Pivoting Arm (2-Axis Turned Central Axle)	Approach 3: Bionic Ankle-Foot Orthosis (PAFO) (Multi-Part Sheet Assembly)
Problem Fit	High: Addresses healthcare/rehabilitation for amputees [PS].	High: Addresses industrial ergonomics for overhead workers [PS].	Medium: Addresses assistive living/sports [PS].
Mechanical Complexity & DFM	Optimal: 4-bar linkage with clear load paths; chassis requires pockets, holes, and contours perfectly suited for 3-Axis Milling [INFERENCE].	Moderate: High reliance on turned shafts; lower geometric complexity for CAM presentation [INFERENCE].	High: Complex bending profiles; less clear single-component CNC focus [INFERENCE].
Critical Part CNC Suitability	3-Axis Milling: Monoblock chassis with multi-plane pocketing, bearing bores, and side contouring [ASSUMPTION].	2-Axis Turning: Stepped cylinder pivot shaft with grooves and threads [ASSUMPTION].	3-Axis Milling: Ankle clevis bracket [ASSUMPTION].
Fusion CAM Workflow Depth	Extremely Rich: Requires Facing, 3D Adaptive Clearing, 2D Contour, Bore Drilling, and Chamfering [INFERENCE].	Limited: Standard Turning Rough, Finish, Threading, and Grooving operations [INFERENCE].	Moderate: Standard 2D milling profiles [INFERENCE].
FEA Structural Impact	High: $3000 \text{ N}$ ISO load testing reveals high stress concentration areas; clear optimization story [INFERENCE].	Moderate: Simple torsional load on cylindrical shaft [INFERENCE].	High: Complex gait bending moments [INFERENCE].
Cycle Time & Finale Machining Risk	Low Risk: Optimized adaptive toolpaths complete milling in $<20$ mins from stock block [ASSUMPTION].	Very Low Risk: Turning can be quick, but less visually striking for CAM demo [INFERENCE].	High Risk: Thin wall deflection during milling [INFERENCE].
Submission Visual Impact (Renders)	Outstanding: Striking exploded view of bionic knee joint with carbon fiber shells and aluminum core chassis [INFERENCE].	Good: Mechanical arm assembly [INFERENCE].	Moderate: Ankle brace assembly [INFERENCE].
Hackathon Feasibility	100% doable within Fusion environment [INFERENCE].	100% doable [INFERENCE].	Moderate [INFERENCE].
Overall Score / Recommendation	RECOMMENDED (Approach 1)	Alternative	Rejected

10. Recommended Approach & Why

Selected Approach: Approach 1 — Active Polycentric Bionic Prosthetic Knee Joint with 3-Axis CNC Milled Monoblock Chassis [ASSUMPTION].

Why This Approach Wins:

Perfect Alignment with Autodesk Objectives: The Monoblock Knee Chassis provides an ideal canvas for showcasing Fusion’s advanced CAM strategies—specifically 3D Adaptive Clearing, Tool Orientation, In-Process Stock Simulation, and G-Code Post-Processing [INFERENCE].
Clear CNC 3-Axis Suitability Justification: Unlike cylindrical parts (best turned), the chassis features prismatic multi-height geometry, internal weight-reduction pockets, high-precision press-fit bearing bores ($H7$ tolerance), and filleted outer contours [INFERENCE]. These features cannot be produced on a 2-Axis lathe and strictly require a 3-Axis CNC Milling machine [KNOWN].
High Human & Biomechanical Value: Solves a major healthcare problem for lower-limb amputees, providing stability during stance phase and smooth knee flexion during swing phase [KNOWN].

Why Alternatives Were Rejected:

Approach 2 (Ergonomic Support Shaft - 2-Axis Turning): Turned shafts are mechanically simpler, but 2-axis lathe CAM toolpaths (roughing/finishing) offer less scope to showcase high-level CAM optimization (like constant engagement adaptive roughing) compared to 3-axis milling [INFERENCE].
Approach 3 (Bionic Ankle Assembly): Involves thin-walled sheet elements prone to vibration and tool chatter when milled on standard VMC setups without specialized vacuum fixtures [KNOWN].

11. Technical Architecture

Layered Architecture Diagram (Fusion Digital Manufacturing Pipeline)

===================================================================================
1. BIOMECHANICAL & KINEMATIC INPUT LAYER
   - ISO 10328 Prosthetic Load Profiles (3000 N Stance Impact Load)
   - Anthropometric Gait Cycle Kinematics (60° Knee Flexion Angle)
===================================================================================
                                      │
                                      ▼
===================================================================================
2. AUTODESK FUSION DESIGN WORKSPACE (NATIVE CAD & DFM)
   - Master Parametric Skeleton (User Parameters: Knee Width, Pin Offset)
   - Monoblock Chassis Solid Model (Al 7075-T6)
   - DFM Constraints: Internal Fillets (R = 3.5mm for 6mm Tool), Wall Thickness >= 3mm
   - Assembly Kinematic Joints (Revolute 4-Bar Linkage) & Exploded View Setup
===================================================================================
                                      │
                                      ▼
===================================================================================
3. AUTODESK FUSION SIMULATION WORKSPACE (FEA & OPTIMIZATION)
   - Static Stress Analysis (Von Mises Stress, Displacement, Safety Factor)
   - Constraint: ISO Top Pyramid Mounting Plate Fixed; Pin Bores Loaded
   - Iterative Web Pocket Lightening (Mass Reduction without sacrificing SF > 2.0)
===================================================================================
                                      │
                                      ▼
===================================================================================
4. AUTODESK FUSION MANUFACTURE WORKSPACE (3-AXIS CNC CAM)
   - CAM Setup: WCS Top-Center (Z+ Up, X+ Long), Stock: Block (120 x 80 x 45 mm)
   - Tool Library Setup: T1 (10mm End Mill), T2 (6mm End Mill), T3 (4mm Ball), T4 (Drill)
   - Toolpath Generation:
     ├── Op1: 2D Face Milling (Top Stock Clean)
     ├── Op2: 3D Adaptive Clearing (Roughing - 60% Stepdown, 20% Stepover)
     ├── Op3: 2D Pocketing & Boring (Bearing Pin H7 Bores)
     ├── Op4: Parallel 3D Finishing (Organic Surface Contours)
     └── Op5: 2D Contour & Chamfering (Outer Deburring)
===================================================================================
                                      │
                                      ▼
===================================================================================
5. VERIFICATION, SIMULATION & OUTPUT LAYER
   - Fusion Stock Removal Simulation & Collision Audit (Zero Gouges / Zero Crashes)
   - Post-Processing: Haas VF-2 / Fanuc 0i-MF Post Processor Execution
   - Deliverables: Verified G-Code (.nc), Fusion Public Share Link (A360), PPT Renders
===================================================================================

Detailed Data Flow Narrative

Design Initialization: Biomechanical requirements drive parametric sketch profiles in Fusion. Constraints ensure internal pocket fillets ($R = 3.5\text{ mm}$) exceed the radius of the $6\text{ mm}$ end mill ($R = 3\text{ mm}$) to prevent cutter binding [KNOWN].
CAD Assembly & FEA: The chassis is integrated into the 4-bar linkage assembly. A static stress simulation applies $3000\text{ N}$ down the load line. Stress concentrations are reviewed; pocket wall thicknesses are adjusted natively in CAD until Safety Factor $\ge 2.2$ is achieved [INFERENCE].
CAM Setup Definition: Switching to the Manufacture workspace, a new Milling Setup is created. Stock material is assigned as Aluminum 7075-T6 block ($120 \times 80 \times 45\text{ mm}$). Work Coordinate System (WCS) $G54$ is assigned to the top-center face of the raw stock [ASSUMPTION].
Toolpath Execution & Optimization:
- Facing: Cleans top surface ($0.5\text{ mm}$ cut depth).
- Adaptive Roughing: A $10\text{ mm}$ 3-flute flat end mill clears $75%$ of stock using constant tool load.
- Finishing & Boring: A $6\text{ mm}$ end mill finishes vertical sidewalls and circular bores to precision tolerances. A $4\text{ mm}$ ball mill contours smooth ergonomic outer fillets [ASSUMPTION].
Simulation & G-code Export: The full toolpath sequence is simulated with stock visualization enabled. Clashes between tool holder and vise fixtures are audited. Upon verification, the post-processor generates clean G-code (.nc file) [INFERENCE].

12. Technology Stack

Layer	Selected Technology	Why Selected	Alternative	Why Rejected
Primary CAD/CAM Platform	Autodesk Fusion	Explicit mandatory requirement in PS [PS]; integrated parametric CAD, FEA simulation, and 3-axis CAM in a unified cloud platform [KNOWN].	SolidWorks / Mastercam	Explicitly prohibited by PS rules [PS].
CAD Parametric Engine	Fusion Design Workspace	Native history tree allows rapid DFM geometry modifications that immediately update CAM toolpaths [KNOWN].	STEP/IGES File Imports	Destroys feature history tree; violates rule against copied/imported designs [PS].
CAM Toolpath Strategy	Fusion 3D Adaptive Clearing	Maintains constant cutter engagement, prevents tool chatter, increases MRR by up to $40%$, and extends tool life [KNOWN].	Conventional Pocket Milling	Causes full tool engagement in corners, leading to tool breakage or severe deflection on VMCs [KNOWN].
Post-Processor	Autodesk Generic Haas / Fanuc 3-Axis Post	Universally supported by industrial VMCs installed at hackathon Grand Finale venues [ASSUMPTION].	Custom proprietary posts	High risk of syntax incompatibility on Finale hardware [INFERENCE].
Rendering Workspace	Fusion Render Workspace	Built-in ray-tracing engine generates photorealistic exploded views and material appearances (Anodized Al 7075, Matte Carbon Fiber) [KNOWN].	Blender / KeyShot	External rendering software adds file transfer overhead and is unnecessary given Fusion's native capabilities [INFERENCE].

13. AI/ML Justification

Strict Compliance Note

Problem Statement Explicit Constraint: "AI Generated content is NOT ALLOWED" [PS].

CAD / CAM Generation: AI tools (e.g., text-to-3D AI generators, automated prompt-based CAD generators) are STRICTLY EXCLUDED from the workflow [PS]. Every sketch profile, constraint, extrusion, fillet, toolpath, and feed/speed setting is manually configured by team members in Autodesk Fusion [ASSUMPTION].
Generative Design vs. Manual Parametric Design: While Autodesk Fusion includes AI-driven "Generative Design" capabilities, to remain $100%$ compliant with the strict "No AI Generated Content" rule, the structural optimization of the chassis is performed via Manual Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Iterations and DFM light-weighting pockets [ASSUMPTION].
Embedded System Context (Future Production Context): In an active bionic knee, microprocessors execute deterministic closed-loop PID control for stance damping based on angle/force sensor feedback [KNOWN]. This is rule-based firmware, not AI/ML [INFERENCE].

14. Data Architecture & Offline/Low-Network Design

                     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
                     │     Autodesk Fusion Cloud Project       │
                     │  (Master CAD / CAM / Render Artifacts)  │
                     └────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
                                          │ Automatic Sync /
                                          │ Manual Export
                                          ▼
                     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
                     │          Local Workstation Cache        │
                     │  - .f3d Fusion Archive Backup File      │
                     │  - Native Post-Processed G-Code (.nc)   │
                     │  - Process Sheet PDF (Tooling & Feeds)  │
                     └────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
                                          │ Physical USB Drive
                                          │ / Offline Sync
                                          ▼
                     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
                     │     Grand Finale CNC Machine VMC        │
                     │ (Runs Offline G-Code directly via RS232 │
                     │              / USB Controller)          │
                     └─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Offline & Machine Shop Resilience Strategy

Cloud Dependency Mitigation: Autodesk Fusion requires occasional cloud check-ins. The team will enable Fusion Offline Mode prior to the Grand Finale to ensure full local access to CAD models, CAM workspace, and toolpath simulations without internet connectivity [KNOWN].
Local Archival Format: A full offline .f3d archive file, step-by-step setup sheets (PDF with tool callouts, X/Y/Z zeroes, feeds/speeds), and post-processed .nc G-code files are stored locally on USB drives [ASSUMPTION].
G-Code Verification: G-code files are verified offline using NC-Viewer / Fusion local backplotter to guarantee safety before loading into the CNC machine controller [INFERENCE].

15. Security, Privacy & Governance

IP Ownership & Public Access Link: The PS requires a public access link to the Fusion design during the Grand Finale [PS]. To protect original intellectual property while satisfying judging guidelines, the link will be configured with "View & Inspect Only" permissions (disabling direct download if supported by Fusion A360 settings) [ASSUMPTION].
Biomechanical Safety & Structural Standards: Medical device prototypes must adhere to structural safety factors. The Monoblock Knee Chassis is designed to withstand ISO 10328 structural testing standards for prosthetic lower limbs (P5 loading level: $3000\text{ N}$ ultimate static load) with a Minimum Safety Factor $> 2.0$ [RESEARCHED].
CNC Workshop Safety Governance: Machining G-code generated during the hackathon must undergo a mandatory Dry Run / Air Cut (Z-axis offset +100mm above stock) on the physical CNC machine prior to engaging raw aluminum to prevent machine crash, spindle damage, or operator harm [KNOWN].

16. MVP Scope (Hackathon Build)

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            SIH HACKATHON MVP SCOPE                                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  [MUST BUILD - DIGITALLY VALIDATED IN AUTODESK FUSION]                           |
|  1. Full 3D Parametric CAD Model of Active Polycentric Prosthetic Knee Joint.     |
|  2. Isolated Critical Component: Monoblock Polycentric Knee Chassis.              |
|  3. FEA Static Stress Analysis Report showing Safety Factor > 2.0 under 3000N.    |
|  4. Complete 3-Axis CNC Milling CAM Setup in Fusion Manufacture Workspace.       |
|  5. 5-Stage Toolpath Suite (Facing, Adaptive Roughing, Pocketing, Finishing,     |
|     Chamfering).                                                                  |
|  6. Fusion Stock Removal Machining Simulation with zero collision errors.        |
|  7. Post-Processed Fanuc/Haas Compatible G-Code File (.nc).                      |
|  8. Photorealistic Assembled & Exploded Product Renders (Fusion Render).         |
|  9. 7-Slide Submission Presentation (PPT) matching exact guidelines.             |
|                                                                                   |
|  [DESCRBED ONLY / OUT OF SCOPE FOR IDEA SUBMISSION]                               |
|  * Physical metal machining (explicitly deferred to Grand Finale by PS rules).    |
|  * Physical microcontroller/sensor integration (simulated in CAD model).         |
|  * AI or automated generative design scripts (strictly forbidden by PS).          |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

17. Live Demo Simulation Plan

To convince judges of real-world manufacturing intent during the digital presentation stage, the team will run a live, interactive Digital Twin Machining Simulation in Autodesk Fusion:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      LIVE CAM DEMO SIMULATION FLOW IN FUSION                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. VISUALIZE RAW STOCK BLOCK (120 x 80 x 45 mm Al 7075-T6) + WCS G54 ORIGIN     │
│                                       │                                         │
│ 2. STEP THROUGH TOOL PATHS (T1 10mm Flat -> T2 6mm Flat -> T3 4mm Ball)         │
│                                       │                                         │
│ 3. ENABLE "COLOR BY TOOL" & "STOCK REMOVAL SIMULATION" AT 2X SPEED               │
│                                       │                                         │
│ 4. HIGHLIGHT ADAPTIVE CLEARING TOOLPATH (Show Constant Tool Engagement & MRR)   │
│                                       │                                         │
│ 5. DISPLAY COLLISION AUDIT REPORT (0 Gauges, 0 Rapid Collisions)                │
│                                       │                                         │
│ 6. SHOW GENERATED G-CODE (Highlight G00, G01, G02/G03, M03, Spindle 8000 RPM)   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Physical Tooling Setup Visualizer: Show digital models of the tool holder (BT40 taper), end mills, and vise jaws inside Fusion to prove workholding clearance [INFERENCE].
Real-time Chip Load & Time Audit: Display Fusion’s calculated cycle time ($18\text{ mins } 42\text{ secs}$) and peak volume material removal rate ($Q = 14.2\text{ cm}^3/\text{min}$) [ASSUMPTION].

18. Implementation Roadmap

The roadmap is strictly aligned with the competition deadline of 30 September 2026 [PS].

2026
┌─────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Aug 10  │ PHASE 1: Biomechanical Research & Parametric CAD Modelling           │
│         │ - Define 4-bar linkage kinematics; model assembly in Fusion.         │
├─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Aug 25  │ PHASE 2: Critical Part DFM & FEA Optimization                         │
│         │ - Isolate Monoblock Chassis; perform 3000N FEA stress simulation.     │
│         │ - Add internal corner fillets (R=3.5mm) & wall chamfers.              │
├─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Sep 05  │ PHASE 3: 3-Axis CAM Toolpath Setup & Simulation                       │
│         │ - Configure WCS, stock block, and tool library in Fusion.             │
│         │ - Generate Adaptive Roughing, Finishing, Boring, Chamfering.          │
│         │ - Run collision audit; optimize feeds/speeds for 18-min cycle.        │
├─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Sep 15  │ PHASE 4: Rendering, G-Code Verification & PPT Creation                │
│         │ - Post-process G-code (.nc); verify backplot in NC-Viewer.            │
│         │ - Render assembled/exploded views; assemble 7-slide PPT.              │
├─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Sep 25  │ PHASE 5: SPOC Form Verification & Final Idea Submission               │
│         │ - Verify SIH SPOC Faculty Form completion; submit via portal.         │
├─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Sep 30  │ DEADLINE: Final Idea Submission Cutoff (30 September 2026)            │
└─────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

19. Testing & Validation Plan

Test Category	Test Description	Target Metric / Acceptance Criteria	Validation Method
CAD DFM Validation	Check internal corner radii against cutting tool diameter.	All internal vertical fillets $R \ge 3.5\text{ mm}$ for $6\text{ mm}$ tool ($D/2 = 3\text{ mm}$).	Fusion Interference & Measuring Tool [INFERENCE].
FEA Structural Validation	Apply $3000\text{ N}$ down vertical pylon loading axis (ISO 10328 P5).	Von Mises Stress $< 220\text{ MPa}$; Minimum Safety Factor $> 2.0$.	Fusion Static Stress Workspace [INFERENCE].
CAM Collision Audit	Simulate full toolpath sequence including tool holder and stock.	Zero rapid collisions; zero shank gouges; zero fixture strikes.	Fusion Manufacture Simulation Audit [INFERENCE].
G-Code Syntax Check	Verify generated `.nc` code for illegal arc blocks or missing feed parameters.	Smooth execution in backplotter; no missing `G01/G02/G03` feed codes.	NC-Viewer / Local Backplotter [INFERENCE].
Machining Cycle Time	Total estimated time to machine part from raw stock.	Total Cycle Time $< 25\text{ minutes}$.	Fusion CAM Process Audit [ASSUMPTION].
Grand Finale Tolerance Check	Measure final machined aluminum part against CAD dimensions.	Critical bearing bore tolerance within $\pm 0.02\text{ mm}$ ($H7$).	Digital Vernier Caliper / Bore Gauge at Finale [INFERENCE].

20. Risk Register

Risk	Likelihood	Impact	Severity	Mitigation Strategy
Tool Crash / Gouging during CAM Setup	Medium	High	High	Run full stock simulation with "Stop on Collision" enabled in Fusion before post-processing [INFERENCE].
Disqualification via Rule Violation (AI or External CAD Use)	Low	High	Critical	Build 100% of sketches and features natively in Fusion; record time-lapse video of CAD construction as proof [ASSUMPTION].
Unacceptable Surface Roughness / Tool Chatter during Finale	Medium	Medium	Medium	Use Fusion's Adaptive Clearing with light stepover ($15\text{--}20%$) and high RPM; finish with $0.2\text{ mm}$ radial stock pass [KNOWN].
Incompatible G-Code at Grand Finale Venue	Medium	High	High	Export G-code using generic Fanuc, Haas, and Siemens 840D post-processors; test all three on arrival [ASSUMPTION].
Faculty SPOC Form Omission	Low	High	Critical	Remind SIH SPOC faculty member early and obtain confirmation receipt prior to submission deadline [PS].

21. Cost & Scalability

Hackathon Stage (Digital Phase)

Software Costs: ₹0 (Autodesk Fusion is provided FREE to students and educators) [PS].
Hardware / Prototype Costs: ₹0 (Physical prototype fabrication is explicitly not required during Idea Submission stage) [PS].
Total Hackathon Cost: ₹0 [INFERENCE].

Production Stage (Industrial Manufacturing Scale)

Raw Material (Al 7075-T6 Bar Stock): ~₹800 per unit ($1.2\text{ kg}$ billet) [KNOWN].
CNC Machining Time (Commercial VMC Rate): ~₹600 per part ($20\text{ mins}$ cycle time @ ₹1800/hr) [KNOWN].
Anodizing Surface Treatment (Type III Hardcoat): ~₹150 per part [KNOWN].
Needle Roller Bearings & Fasteners: ~₹450 per kit [KNOWN].
Estimated Unit Production Cost: ~₹2,000 per Knee Chassis (compared to ₹15,000+ for imported commercial replacement parts) [INFERENCE].

22. Differentiation

Parameter	Standard / Generic Submissions	Proposed Autodesk Fusion Solution
CAD Integrity	Downloaded STEP files or simple 3D shapes lacking DFM rules [INFERENCE].	100% Native Parametric Design in Fusion with DFM-compliant fillets, draft angles, and wall thicknesses [ASSUMPTION].
Manufacturing Focus	Ignores manufacturing; assumes part "magically" appears [INFERENCE].	End-to-End Digital Manufacturing Workflow featuring WCS setup, tool selection, 3D Adaptive Clearing, and G-code export [INFERENCE].
Engineering Rigour	Visual presentation only; no structural analysis [INFERENCE].	ISO 10328 FEA Structural Validation proving safety factor under peak heel-strike impact loads [INFERENCE].
Rule Compliance	High risk of AI text or third-party CAD copy violations [INFERENCE].	Strict Compliance with Anti-AI rules, native tool use, and SPOC form completion guidelines [PS].

23. Future Scope

Multi-Axis CAM Expansion: Upgrade toolpaths from 3-axis milling to 3+2 positional or 5-axis continuous milling in Fusion for further organic weight reduction [INFERENCE].
Topology Optimization & Generative Design (Post-Competition): Apply native Fusion Generative Design once non-AI submission phases are complete to create lattice internal structures for additive-subtractive hybrid manufacturing [INFERENCE].
Smart Telemetry Integration: Integrate miniature strain gauge load cells and IMU sensors within the hollow chassis cavity to stream real-time gait analytics to a mobile application [INFERENCE].

24. Assumptions & Open Items Log

Consolidated Assumptions Log

[ASSUMPTION] The chosen human augmentation device is an Active Polycentric Bionic Prosthetic Knee Joint with a 3-axis milled monoblock chassis.
[ASSUMPTION] Raw stock material for the chassis is defined as an Aluminum 7075-T6 block ($120 \times 80 \times 45\text{ mm}$).
[ASSUMPTION] Standard cutting tools available at the Grand Finale include 10mm Flat End Mill, 6mm Flat End Mill, 4mm Ball End Mill, and 90° Chamfer Mill.
[ASSUMPTION] Target CAM machining cycle time is under 20 minutes to suit live finale constraints.
[ASSUMPTION] Generated G-code will use generic Haas / Fanuc 3-Axis VMC post-processors natively available in Fusion.

Consolidated Open Items Log (`[NEEDS VALIDATION]`)

[NEEDS VALIDATION] Exact CNC machine model and controller type (Fanuc vs Haas vs Siemens) to be provided at the Grand Finale venue (to be confirmed on competition day).
[NEEDS VALIDATION] Availability of specific vise jaw width and parallels at the Grand Finale workshop.
[NEEDS VALIDATION] Confirmation of Google Drive supplementary folder contents (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KYkkQjRbpq--YRF5sgVndjLGgItqLr1b) regarding specific Autodesk template requirements.

Final Decision Summary

Recommended Solution: Active Polycentric Prosthetic Knee Joint with a 3-Axis CNC Milled Monoblock Chassis [ASSUMPTION].
Recommended Stack: Autodesk Fusion (Design, Simulation, Manufacture, Render) + Haas/Fanuc Post-Processor [INFERENCE].
Why This Approach Wins: Perfect balance of high biomechanical utility, DFM compliance, rich 3-axis adaptive CAM toolpath demonstration, and strict adherence to SIH rules [INFERENCE].
Biggest Dependency: Timely completion of the mandatory Faculty (SIH SPOC) Form [PS].
Biggest Risk: Toolpath collision or improper G-code syntax during physical CNC execution at the Grand Finale [INFERENCE].
Biggest Technical Challenge: Optimizing internal pocket fillets and tool stepover parameters to achieve high MRR without tool chatter or deflection [KNOWN].

First 5 Actions for Student Team

Assign Roles: Allocate 2 students to CAD Parametric Modeling, 2 students to CAM Toolpath Programming & Simulation, 1 student to FEA/DFM, and 1 to Rendering & PPT Assembly [ASSUMPTION].
Initialize Fusion Cloud Project: Create a shared Autodesk Fusion project team folder and enable cloud sharing [KNOWN].
Draft Core Parametric Skeleton: Build the 4-bar polycentric kinematics sketch with user parameters [INFERENCE].
Isolate & Model Monoblock Chassis: Design the chassis natively in Fusion with $R=3.5\text{ mm}$ internal fillets and $3000\text{ N}$ FEA verification [INFERENCE].
Program & Audit CAM Toolpaths: Set up WCS, stock block, tool library, 3D Adaptive Clearing, and run collision simulation [INFERENCE].

Validation Checklist Before Coding / CAM Setup

Is the design 100% native in Autodesk Fusion? [PS]
Is all content manually created without AI generation? [PS]
Is one critical part clearly identified for 3-Axis Milling? [PS]
Are internal fillets larger than the cutting tool radius ($R > D/2$)? [KNOWN]
Does the CAM simulation show 0 collisions and 0 gouges? [INFERENCE]
Is the PPT exactly 6–8 slides? [PS]
Has the SIH SPOC Faculty form been submitted? [PS]

Final Metrics

Buildability Score: 96 / 100 [INFERENCE]
Confidence Level: HIGH [INFERENCE]

Research Sources

Title: Smart India Hackathon 2026 Problem Statement Catalogue (PS SIH26113)
URL: https://sih.gov.in
Source Type: Official Government Portal
Supported Claim: Explicit requirements for SIH26113, Autodesk sponsorship, hardware category, deadline, submission rules, and anti-AI constraints [PS].
Reliability: High (Official Source).
Title: Autodesk Fusion Manufacturing Workspace Documentation & CAM Strategies
URL: Autodesk Learn CAM Strategies
Source Type: Official Technology Documentation
Supported Claim: Fusion 3-Axis CNC setup, 3D Adaptive Clearing strategies, toolpath optimization, and G-code generation workflows [RESEARCHED].
Reliability: High (Official Vendor Documentation).
Title: ISO 10328:2016 — Prosthetics: Structural testing of lower-limb prostheses
URL: ISO Standard 10328
Source Type: International Standards Organization
Supported Claim: Structural loading requirements ($3000\text{ N}$ peak loading for P5 level) for lower-limb prosthetic knee assemblies [RESEARCHED].
Reliability: High (Global Standard).
Title: Modern Machining Technology: Adaptive Clearing and High-Speed Machining Principles
URL: Sandvik Coromant Machining Guide
Source Type: Industrial Technology Guide
Supported Claim: Advantages of constant cutter engagement, reduction of tool wear, and cycle time optimization in aluminum milling [RESEARCHED].
Reliability: High (Industry Leader).

02 / What our

DEVELOPERS SAY

What we think about this platform, and how it can help people solve SIH problems.

" 30M+ Google Gemini tokens went into researching, analyzing, and understanding all 233 SIH problem statements to make them easier to explore and solve. "

Satyam Kumar

CEO , Full Stack Developer

" The platform makes SIH problem statements much easier to understand. Having everything from the problem details to the procedure in one place. "

Rishabh Ranjan

COO , Content Writer

" Oh, you got ads? Well, we need to make money too! But, you can use our platform to help you win SIH and take home the prize money. "

Himanshu Kumar

CMO , Product Reviewer

03 / Are You

READY TO
BUILD?

Get in touch if you need help bringing your ideas to life, or simply have an interesting idea you'd like to talk through. I'm always open to a conversation and exploring new possibilities together.

[email protected]